Grab's fines should cancel out Uber merger gain: Ryde

The firm supported the CCCS' remedies to “bring back” competition.

Ride-hailing firm RYDE Technologies challenged Grab's statement that the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore’s (CCCS) decision on the Grab-Uber merger is "overreaching and goes against Singapore's pro-innovation and pro-business regulations in a free market economy.”

Ryde previously said that it supported the CCCS’ decision as it “will promote competition and is healthy for ride-hailing in Singapore,” however it also argued that more could be done.

The ride-hailing firm wrote in an open letter the financial penalty that CCCS is considering should annul the ‘supposed’ financial gain resulting from Grab-Uber merger and that anything is less is not an appropriate censure. “This would deter future errant companies with similar intentions in ride-hailing and in other industries,” it said.

Ryde added that it supported the removal of Grab’s exclusivity obligations, lock-in periods, and termination fees. “Removing exclusive obligations is imperative. A new entrant starts off with a ‘major disadvantage’ because having fewer riders and drivers makes it very difficult for it to reach a sufficient scale to challenge the incumbent’s “network effect” advantage,” it said.

It backed CCCS’ proposed remedies to remove Grab’s exclusivity arrangements with any taxi/CPHC fleet in Singapore and the maintenance of its pre-transaction pricing algorithm.

Ryde also supported the CCCS’ decision to require Uber to sell Lion City Rentals (LCR) to any potential competitor who makes a reasonable offer. “Furthermore, LCR should be able to work openly and immediately with Ryde to onboard drivers and also with any future entrant post-acquisition,” it added.

Meanwhile, DBS Equity Research analyst Andy Sim commented that despite the measures, the strong escalation of competition in the ride-hailing landscape is unlikely and a “death-match” could happen instead. “Overall, in our view, having seen a full cycle of entrants and eventual exits (since 2013 with Uber's entry) of private hailing app players, we believe that a strong escalation of competition and reversion to high incentives and discounts (where participants incur sustained losses) seem unlikely,” he said.

Instead, the situation could provide a window of opportunity for Go-Jek, given its financial backing. “We believe this could also provide an opportunity for ComfortDelGro (CD) to have a more dominant presence in the private car rental space, assuming it is able to partner Go-Jek, similar to its original plan with UberFlash/acquisition of 51% stake in LCR,” Sim added.

Reaching the people who run Asia's businesses is harder than it used to be.

Inboxes are crowded. Attention is short. The executives you most want to reach — the founders, CFOs, and operators who actually move budgets — are the hardest to find through the usual channels. If you're building a company, a category, or a reputation, you already know this.

We've spent twenty years building the room they read. Singapore Business Review is where senior decision makers in Singapore and across Southeast Asia come for business coverage they can't get elsewhere — in print, online, and in person at the summits and roundtables we host across seven markets.

If you have something these readers should know about — a point of view worth publishing, a product worth their attention, an event worth their time — we'd like to hear what you're trying to do.

Book a meeting

| Or download the media kit (PDF)

240,000 senior readers quarterly in print Top 1,700 Singapore companies reached

7 markets across Southeast Asia