DBS net profits fell below market expectations

It's more than $20m short of the consensus.

 4Q12 was below expectations due to greater-than-expected NIM compression, a rise in credit costs and higher opex, said CIMB.

Reflecting seasonality, IB and trade fees were weak though wealth management and credit cards.

Some of the negatives look are one-off in nature, notes CIMB but it adds that they are not too concerned.

"4Q12 core net profit (S$760m) fell below our S$807m and Street’s S$787m. FY12 forms 98% of our FY12. DBS has guided for bottoming margins. We trim FY13-14 EPS by 2-3% but maintain Outperform with a slightly higher DDM-based target price (1.27x CY13 P/BV; g 4.2%) after trimming margins. Catalysts are still expected from a variety of fee earnings drivers."

Here's more from CIMB:

Net interest income was flat qoq as NIM contracted another 5bp to 1.62%. Loan volumes were up 4% qoq, while LDR edged up to 87%. Hong Kong
margins were stable (+1bp). Margin contraction in China (regulatory driven) carried over from earlier quarters. Management’s guidance on margins was surprisingly bullish - margins could be close to a bottom as the yield curve steepens.

Loan growth came mostly from Singapore and Rest of Greater China; sector-wise, the growth was led by building & construction and general commerce.
Higher costs, allowances Seasonal effects took their toll on IB and trade fees, though decent credit-card, wealth-management and trading income compensated, so non-NII was better than expected.

Better revenue was, however, doused by higher costs and provisions. Costs went up mostly on computerisation costs. 4Q cost ratio rose to 48%. Provisions climbed 50% qoq, both from general and specific allowances.

While this was a broad-based scrub of its loan book, management did say provisions should trend up from current low levels.

Higher computerisation costs and weak IB fees appear to be more seasonal and/or one-off. The more structural negative was rising credit costs, but we expect that to be an industry trend. Unrelenting margin squeeze is the more company-specific negative, but the guide for bottoming margins sounds like a reprieve.

Join Singapore Business Review community
A NOTE FROM SINGAPORE BUSINESS REVIEW

If you've been wondering whether SBR could work for your company — yes, probably.

A lot of the companies we partner with started as readers. They'd been following our coverage for a while, saw their own customers and competitors in it, and eventually asked the obvious question: could we do something with you? The answer is usually yes. The shape of it depends on what you're trying to do.


The options are broader than most people assume — thought leadership articles, sponsored content, industry summits across Southeast Asia, regional awards programmes, podcasts, and media placements in print and digital. Some partners use one channel; most use a mix. We figure out the right combination by starting with your brief, not with our rate card.


So if the question has been on your mind, here's the easy way to ask it.

We'll tell you honestly whether we can help, and how. It's a better use of everyone's time.