, Singapore
Photo from Unsplash by AVIER SEPULVEDA PASCUAL.

CCS overhauls passenger airline alliance framework

Airline alliance notifications are now streamlined into a three-step approach.

The Competition and Consumer Commission (CCS) has updated its passenger airline guidance note for alliance agreements, introducing a more structured review process and expanded guidance on how airlines can address competition concerns.

The revised guidelines, known as PAGN 2026, take effect from 27 July 2026 and supersede the previous guidance note. The new rules follow a public consultation conducted between 25 February and 11 March 2026, with contributions from the business and legal community described as generally supportive.

The key changes cover four areas. The review process for airline alliance notifications has been streamlined into a three-step approach, with clearer milestones on when airlines should initiate commitment discussions with CCS and when to finalise commitments for market testing.

The guidelines also expand guidance on the types of commitments airlines may offer to address competition concerns, including capacity commitments, capacity growth mechanisms and non-fulfilment allowances.

On competition assessment, the updated guidelines provide more comprehensive guidance on how CCS evaluates passenger airline alliance agreements, including the treatment of differentiated airline products such as full service airlines and low cost carriers, as well as metal-neutral alliances.

The guidelines also set out CCS's analytical framework for assessing whether an alliance qualifies for the Net Economic Benefit exclusion under the Competition Act, including the evidential requirements for substantiating efficiency claims and examples of efficiencies previously accepted or rejected by CCS.

The guidelines will be reviewed periodically to ensure their continued efficacy, taking into account insights from CCS's cases and best practices from other competition jurisdictions.

Follow the link for more news on

Join Singapore Business Review community
A NOTE FROM SINGAPORE BUSINESS REVIEW

If you've been wondering whether SBR could work for your company — yes, probably.

A lot of the companies we partner with started as readers. They'd been following our coverage for a while, saw their own customers and competitors in it, and eventually asked the obvious question: could we do something with you? The answer is usually yes. The shape of it depends on what you're trying to do.


The options are broader than most people assume — thought leadership articles, sponsored content, industry summits across Southeast Asia, regional awards programmes, podcasts, and media placements in print and digital. Some partners use one channel; most use a mix. We figure out the right combination by starting with your brief, not with our rate card.


So if the question has been on your mind, here's the easy way to ask it.

We'll tell you honestly whether we can help, and how. It's a better use of everyone's time.

Top News

7 in 10 unprepared for AI-driven cyberattacks
Only 38% said their organisation provided training on how to use AI whilst avoiding exploitation.
CCS overhauls passenger airline alliance framework
Airline alliance notifications are now streamlined into a three-step approach.
Aviation
Raffles Medical net profit falls 9.6% to $29m in H1
Its healthcare services division posted a 16% drop in revenue to $119.5m.
Healthcare