Photo from Magnific

Samlit Moneychanger faces 19 charges over remittance complaints

Each breach of a MAS direction carries a maximum $1m fine.

Samlit Moneychanger Pte. Ltd. was charged on 9 July with 19 counts over its alleged failure to comply with a regulatory direction concerning remittance complaints, according to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

Its director and compliance manager were each charged with 17 related offences under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022.

Each failure to comply with a MAS direction carries a maximum fine of $1m upon conviction.

The case followed reports that beneficiaries in China were unable to access money remitted through Samlit after the funds were frozen or confiscated by Chinese authorities.

MAS and the Singapore Police Force (SPF) began joint investigations on 23 February 2024, a day after the regulator directed the company to continue assisting affected remitters and handling their complaints.

The direction required the group to provide customers with remittance information that could support appeals to law enforcement agencies in China.

“During investigations, the compliance manager interfered with SPF’s access to two email accounts used by Samlit, obstructing SPF’s investigation efforts,” MAS said.

Between 24 February and 30 August 2024, police issued 20 orders requiring passwords and authentication access to seized devices and email accounts, which the manager allegedly failed to provide.

He was subsequently charged with two counts of obstruction of justice and 20 counts of failing to comply with police orders. 

The obstruction of justice charges carry a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment, a fine or both. Each failure to assist police with computer access carries up to six months’ imprisonment, a fine of up to $5,000 or both.

The authority took steps in 2024 to secure funds in Samlit’s corporate bank accounts after the company abruptly surrendered its payment services licence during an ongoing inspection.

The MAS direction remains in force until certain conditions are met, including external-auditor confirmation that the group has made sufficient provisions for its liabilities.

Police separately investigated possible fraudulent trading but said the evidence gathered so far was insufficient to support criminal charges.

“The police, in consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers, will be taking no further action at this point,” MAS added.

Join Singapore Business Review community
A NOTE FROM SINGAPORE BUSINESS REVIEW

The people you want to reach are already in this room.

Every quarter, SBR lands on the desks of the founders, CFOs, and directors running Asia's most consequential companies. Every day, they open our newsletter and read our website. It's a room that took twenty years to build — and it's the one most of our partners are trying to get into.

The good news is that the door is open. We work with companies on thought leadership articles, sponsored content, industry summits across Southeast Asia, regional awards programmes, podcasts, and media placements in print and digital. The shape of the right partnership depends on what you're trying to do, which is why we'd rather start with a conversation than send a rate card.


If you have something this room should know about, tell us. We'll tell you honestly whether we can help, and how.

No rate cards until we understand the brief. It's a better use of everyone's time.

Top News

MAS proposes framework to widen retail fund offerings
An Alternative Funds Appendix will accommodate new investment products.
Retail
Expats see wealth gains but face cross-border complexity
96% of expats in Singapore earn more than they would at home, but many struggle with currency volatility and tax rules.