Keppel hit by $495m loss in Q4

Penalty costs from its bribery case pushed earnings down the drain.

Keppel Corporation Limited (Keppel) suffered from a $495m loss in Q4 and a 72% YoY plunge in full-year profits to $217m in 2017.

According to its financial results, profits fell mainly because of the costs of its one-off penalty from Keppel O&M's bribery case across the US, Brazil, and Singapore, which reached a total of $619m.

Excluding the penalty costs, Keppel would have a 7% increase in net profit to $836m for the full-year.

Higher profits from its Singapore trading and fair value gains from its assets were not enough to lift its losses in Q4.

Meanwhile, full-year revenue dipped 12% YoY to $803m.

Keppel CEO Loh Chin Hua said, "The global resolution reached by Keppel O&M brings to an end what has been a painful chapter for Keppel. We have put in place effective compliance controls to ensure that this does not happen again."

Keppel's property division saw a 10% increase in net profit to $685m and remained the largest contributor to group profit. This increase was due mainly to higher fair value gains on investment properties and higher contribution from Singapore and Vietnam property trading and the en bloc divestment of development projects.

Meanwhile, the infrastructure division's net profit jumped 33% to S132m, due mainly to higher contribution from the Energy Infrastructure business and the gain on divestment of interests in GE Keppel Energy Services Pte Ltd.

The investment division's profits also surged to $235m, thanks to a higher share of profit from the SinoSingapore Tianjin Eco-City and k1 Ventures, higher contributions from Keppel Capital, and gains from the sale of investments and the write-back of provision for impairment of investments.  

Join Singapore Business Review community
A NOTE FROM SINGAPORE BUSINESS REVIEW

If you've been wondering whether SBR could work for your company — yes, probably.

A lot of the companies we partner with started as readers. They'd been following our coverage for a while, saw their own customers and competitors in it, and eventually asked the obvious question: could we do something with you? The answer is usually yes. The shape of it depends on what you're trying to do.


The options are broader than most people assume — thought leadership articles, sponsored content, industry summits across Southeast Asia, regional awards programmes, podcasts, and media placements in print and digital. Some partners use one channel; most use a mix. We figure out the right combination by starting with your brief, not with our rate card.


So if the question has been on your mind, here's the easy way to ask it.

We'll tell you honestly whether we can help, and how. It's a better use of everyone's time.

Top News

7 in 10 unprepared for AI-driven cyberattacks
Only 38% said their organisation provided training on how to use AI whilst avoiding exploitation.
CCS overhauls passenger airline alliance framework
Airline alliance notifications are now streamlined into a three-step approach.
Aviation
Raffles Medical net profit falls 9.6% to $29m in H1
Its healthcare services division posted a 16% drop in revenue to $119.5m.
Healthcare